Negative impact of the presence of the robot
Impact on unemployment
Some analysts, such as Martin Ford, author of The Lights in the Tunnel: Automation, Accelerating Technology and the Economy of the Future, argue that robots and other forms of automation will ultimately result in significant unemployment unless the economy is engineered to absorb them without displacing humans, as engine start match and exceed the capability of workers to perform most jobs. At present the negative impact is only on menial jobs and repetitive, and there is actually a positive impact on the number of jobs for highly skilled technicians, engineers, and specialists. However, these highly skilled jobs are not sufficient in number to offset the greater decrease in employment among the general population, causing structural unemployment in which overall (net) increase unemployment.
As robotics and artificial intelligence develop further, some worry that skilled jobs may be threatened even many. According to conventional economic theory, this will only lead to an increase in the productivity of the industry involved; thus higher demand for other goods, and hence higher labor demand in these sectors and the off-setting whatever negatives are caused. Conventional theory describes the past well but may not describe the future scenarios for shifts in the parameter values that shape the context (see Automation and its impact on unemployment).
CONCLUSION
Robots have positive and negative effects depending on the point of view of economic, religious and others. but the robot is just a tool to meet the needs of people can be in use. so do not experience human error when doing the job. . as well as with cyborgs, robots and cyborgs have a different understanding. cyborgs are humans who use the technology. while the robot is a tool.
Impact on unemployment
Some analysts, such as Martin Ford, author of The Lights in the Tunnel: Automation, Accelerating Technology and the Economy of the Future, argue that robots and other forms of automation will ultimately result in significant unemployment unless the economy is engineered to absorb them without displacing humans, as engine start match and exceed the capability of workers to perform most jobs. At present the negative impact is only on menial jobs and repetitive, and there is actually a positive impact on the number of jobs for highly skilled technicians, engineers, and specialists. However, these highly skilled jobs are not sufficient in number to offset the greater decrease in employment among the general population, causing structural unemployment in which overall (net) increase unemployment.
As robotics and artificial intelligence develop further, some worry that skilled jobs may be threatened even many. According to conventional economic theory, this will only lead to an increase in the productivity of the industry involved; thus higher demand for other goods, and hence higher labor demand in these sectors and the off-setting whatever negatives are caused. Conventional theory describes the past well but may not describe the future scenarios for shifts in the parameter values that shape the context (see Automation and its impact on unemployment).
CONCLUSION
Robots have positive and negative effects depending on the point of view of economic, religious and others. but the robot is just a tool to meet the needs of people can be in use. so do not experience human error when doing the job. . as well as with cyborgs, robots and cyborgs have a different understanding. cyborgs are humans who use the technology. while the robot is a tool.
